I will inject >Self Absorbed< into this narrative as in "The man was so self-absorbed he did not see, feel, or hear the thief approach nor cut his tether ." Further, his concern was directed toward >material gain< and he literally thought of nothing else . Is this man, then, a true Innocent ? I say NO . The thief saw him as an easy 'mark' and took advantage of it straight-away .
The man arrives at a well and sees someone who he thinks is in distress . We now know the thief is not only practiced but has KEEN vision and so seeks to "play" this man once more . First he tells the man he has "dropped" FIVE HUNDRED SILVER COINS into the well and then offers him 100 should he manage to retrieve them . The thief is believed by the man, trusted even, but upon what is this trust based ???? The man asks NO Questions, like, HOW THE FUCK DID YOU DROP A SACK OF COINS INTO THIS WELL ???? Even better WHY DIDN'T YOU try YOURSELF ???????
The man's justifies this perilous effort with a common cliche "One door shuts while many are opened" and with this he strips and "plunges" into the well . He made Effort to AVOID THE OBVIOUS, that is, WHO THE FUCK IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD BE CARELSESS ENOUGH TO DROP A SACK OF SIVER COINS INTO A WELL ??????????????????? Innocent ??? Hardly .
Trump voters refused to believe that THEIR OWN MINDS accounted for the first theft, and THEIR OWN MINDS resulted in the second .
I mean, one word : TOOO Good .